Posts Tagged ‘petition’

More Scottish petitions

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

3 new e petitions raised by 3 members of the public who are calling for reform of the spso. So far this year there will have been 5 petitions calling for reform of the spso and Integrity 4 Scotland intend to submit another one in the within the next 2
months. The links to the 3 new petitons are detailed below:-

http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.uk/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=400

http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.uk/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=401

http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.uk/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=402

Scottish Public Service Ombudsman Petition

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Please spread the news about this petition to all who you know even if they never passed by an experience at the SPSO e.g. family members, friends and colleagues. Explain to them the pain you have faced and ask them to sign, so no one else will suffer in the SPSO again. If we do something, we should expect a change. However, if we do nothing, the same pain will remain in the SPSO.Please note Jim Martin has to reapply for his position in the coming several months. This petition will possibly influence the parliament decision to extend for him further year or not (hopefully not). His first term will end May/2011.  ????

Please follow the link to support ending the public pain at the SPSO by signing this petition

http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.u … tionID=398

R. A. Rahman

Last few days to sign the latest petition

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

Only a few days left in which to sign the petition submitted by Graham Crane. If you haven’t yet signed it please consider signing within the next few days. Graham needs 200 signatures in order to get a response from the government.

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Scrap-LGO/

LGO did mislead DCLG

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

After a series of Freedom of Information requests over a period of a few months Trevor Nunn has now uncovered evidence proving that Nigel Karney, Deputy Chief Executive & Secretary of the Commission for Local Administration in England (CLAE), more commonly known as Local Government Ombudsmen (LGO), provided misleading information to the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) regarding the LGOs true compliance rates for the year 2007/8.

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/07/truth-is-out.html

The pathetic response to a petition submitted by Keith Edmunds.

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

The petition

The Government’s pathetic response. (No wonder the country is in such a mess!)

The death of Baby Peter in Haringey was a very tragic case that shocked and appalled the country. Safeguarding children is this Government’s top priority and we expect it to be the top priority for local agencies too. Ministers announced to Parliament on 12 November that they had asked Lord Laming to prepare an independent report of progress being made in the delivery of arrangements to protect children, and to identify any barriers to effective, consistent implementation and how these might be overcome. The Government welcomed Lord Laming’s report, published on 12 March, and responded immediately, accepting all his recommendations and taking swift, decisive action to begin to take them forward. On 6 May the Government published an action plan, confirming its commitment to implementing Lord Laming’s recommendations and its determination to do everything possible to make the arrangements in this country for protecting children the best in the world.

From April 2000 to March 2008 the Local Government Ombudsman investigated 115 complaints about social services as a whole in Haringey. During this time, the Local Government Ombudsman has received 53 complaints about children and family services in Haringey. Of the 53 complains received 12 were resolved through local settlement, 6 resulted in findings of no maladministration, 13 were resolved using Ombudsman’s discretion, 4 were considered to be outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction to investigate and 18 were considered to be premature. Complaints categorised as about children and family services can include child protection, care arrangements including fostering and adoption or arrangements for children leaving care.

The Government considers that the Local Government Ombudsman continues to provide a robust route of redress and that no review is required.

New petition to get rid of the LGO

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

Submitted by Graham Crane. The deadline to sign is 5th September 2009.

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to scrap the local government ombudsman (LGO) as they serve no useful purpose to members of the public they are supposed to serve. According to my own experience and that of others recorded on many web sites, the local government ombudsman serves only to protect Local Authorities interests and serves no useful purpose to members of the public. The people who work for them are ex-council officials and civil servants who take the council’s side regardless of how overwhelming the evidence is. In the tiny number of cases they do find for the public the compensation and remedies are totally inadequate. In these times when we need to save money they are an ideal candidate to cut and as soon as possible.

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Scrap-LGO/